Thoughts From The Peacock Angel |
Professional avenging bitch goddess, lifestyle feminist barbie doll/cartoon wet dream. Ex-Glam Rock groupie happily married to an Elvish prince, living a life of decadence. glamour and quiet domesticity in an old house in an old city on the East Coast. This is no place for minors.
|
Men’s Rights Activists are rage-filled misogynists who claim feminists intentionally “cover up” issues like male rape and workplace injury rates so women can achieve global domination. Har. Those pesky feminazis, however, keep getting in the way, so it’s up to the MRAs to win the world over. And how do they do this? By threatening to “gag, rape and gut” bitches who dare to question their flimsy politics.
This is why I do think and always will think that “men’s rights activism” hates men as well as women. They shout down people who legitimately want things to be better for men so that they can continue to make rape jokes and claim that false rape allegations are much of a thing
Look it’s gender essentialist, femmephobic transphobic bullshit in support of gay marriage, that treats gay women’s sexuality like a punchline. FUCK YOU
literal bullshit.
First of all, Victoria’s secret doesn’t use words like sex or vagina for any reason, and they aren’t raging feminsists. JS.
Also, alienating the majority of their clients and turning on any previous business venture makes literally no sense. Hello, commerical suicide.
Also,…
Look everybody, someone too slow to understand how rape works
(Source: neaature)
Open relationships where you’re allowed to fuck “gender A” but not “Genders, B, C, or D” or whatever combination… mostly it’s dudes telling their girlfriends it’s okay to fuck women. Which… is kinda invalidating, and by kinda I mean seriously really invalidating in terms of queerness.
LESBIAN SEX IS IN FACT SEX, treating it as if “oh, durp de durp de dee, but she’s a LAYYYDEEE so she’s no sexual threat to meee” is demeaning, and gets into some uncomfortable gender/genital essentialist B.S.
Bro, lemme tell ya, I am capable of fucking your girlfriend better than you ever will (no, seriously, I am a sexual prodigy) and she for all I know is capable of fucking me better than you could do or however that analogy works, it’s late, I haven’t slept, I’ve been writing fucked up faerie thing, and vampire porn. Fuck yeah vampire porn… I think I lost control of this post.. I may actually be asleep while I do this. Am I sleep blogging? Fuck.
But, you know what I mean? Guys? This insomnia blogging may be a problem. I have pole fitness tomorrow, but I dun wanna go… man this degenerated quickly.
Really Chloe? You’re worried men won’t find you attractive after they see you with a prosthetic cock? Cry me a fuckin’ river.
Not to mention, Chloe’s clearly never seen porn if she thinks men aren’t into women with dicks.
The only people who can stand radfems are radfems.
| Him: | . . . not everyone with a womb is a woman? I understand that in instances of transgenderism this may be the case, but who decides these things, and who agrees that decision is valid? |
| Me: | ...transgenderism? Really? |
| Uh, I'm talking about being inclusive to trans people, which is really important in terms of being a good feminist at this point. Trans women are denied access to women's shelters and often end up dead because of it. | |
| Trans* men are invisible and treated like failed women, or "Lesbian ultra" even when they're not. | |
| Non-binary people get endless bullshit from the government and everyone else, and you have the audacity to ask "Who agrees that decision is valid" when people are DYING because of their gender identity? | |
| As a non-woman womb haver... please go read even the tiniest bit of information on trans* people before you make such an incredibly ignorant and offensive remark. | |
| TL;DR it should pretty clearly be the person who's gender it is who gets to decide if their gender is "valid" or not. | |
| Him: | |
| Ugh, I do get irritated at people who claim to be social-justice warriors who use their own special language and then feel offended when someone has the "audacity" to use plain English. You're just bitching at me because I'm a dude. So what. If THIS of all things scares you, the concept of actual pan-gender egalitarianism must be petrifying. | |
| Someone just busted out their uber-colossal-social-justice-feminist vocabulary, "intersectionality" "womb-haver" "great big fart noise!" SPEAK ENGLISH! Making one sentence reply to ask "Please, explain more what you mean" and then getting petulant reactionary sign-waving in response? COME ON! Hell there's a feminist sitting right next to me on the couch who thinks that essentially everything you said was utterly retarded! (and I use that word unashamedly, as I'm sure the male/female gender ratio for the mentally handicapped is roughly 50/50). People like you are the reason the world doesn't take egalitarianism seriously because of the fringe that constantly shines a spotlight on the social problems that EVERYONE WHO IS DECENT ALREADY HATES! | |
| In short, I agree with the first poster. Feminism in 2012 is a desire to be totally and undeniably equal in all aspects of life. Women should have as much control over their own bodies as men do over theirs. This is accomplished not by destroying the very concept of gender, or by forcing laws to reflect others, but by simply respecting and loving people no matter what they choose to call themselves, and NOT BY THROWING A FIT EVERY TIME SOMEONE DISAGREES! THIS IS AMERICA, WE HAVE THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH! THE RIGHT TO DISAGREE! and the sooner we recognize that for every human and trans-human being (yes, they do exist), the better. Of course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong. | |
| Also the term "trans-humanism", basically "beyond human" refers to the philosophy of people who see technological advancement as the next stage in human evolution. I myself am a trans-humanist and hope for the one day when we all evolve to the next level and then these problems won't exist anymore anyway. | |
| Me: | Actually it's because you're cis and just made a really transphobic remark. I'm a dude sometimes too, so um, yeah, no, considering the fact that I'm trans, I'm allowed to be personally offended by your ignorant bullshit and yes, we do have freedom of speech and the right to disagree, which applies to me as much as it does to you, meaning I have the right to think your opinion is transphobic bullshit and to publicly criticize you for it. |
Seriously, can we just inundate this guy with feminist thought?
Hey there, privilege haver, I need to ask you a question. Why the fuck are you offended? Why is it that when I point out when you did something homophobic, or misogynistic, or transphobic you feel you have the right to be upset about me pointing this out?
Unless you get offended when someone informs you that you stepped on their foot, you need to shut up, and if you get offended when someone informs you that you stepped on their foot, there’s something wrong with you.
I think the fear of being labeled these things, the sense of upset, the sense of indignation that people get when called on their privilege is a tool of the kyriarchy. We use extreme and blatant displays of prejudice to justify minor ones.
“I’m not beating you up, so what I said can’t be homophobic”
“I think women should be allowed the vote, so I can’t be a misogynist”
and so on and so fourth. Society gives us these extreme, rare and blatant examples of prejudice and tell us that unless our experience lives up to that, we’re not really experiencing it.
Having your words or actions equated to the vitriol spouted by organizations like Westboro Baptist Church is sure to get a rise out of anyone, and make them close their ears to whatever the person is saying, but the thing is, the hatefulness of organizations like Westboro Baptist Church isn’t what the main social problem is, the main problem is subtle and insidious and often subconscious.
So, basically the next time someone calls you out on your privilege or your prejudice, realize they’re not calling you the anti-christ, you said something fucked up, or did something fucked up, and that’s bad, but really seriously, you can apologize and fix it, and you should, because getting offended is how prejudice wins.
This is not meant to excuse your behavior, what you did was definitely wrong, but this is not something that should hurt your feelings. This is something you can fix, just apologize, and read shit, because if you’re stepping on someone’s foot they should not have to explain how not to step on their foot.
Natural does not necessarily mean healthy.
Lead and mercury are natural. Inefficient organic pesticides are worse for you than synthetic advanced ones, and organic farmers use more pesticides.
HEY PSA IF SOMEONE HAS A BAD HABIT OF APOLOGIZING A LOT TRY AND BE PATIENT AND DONT THREATEN THEM BY SAYING YOU’LL DO [insert...
steampunk invention ideas:
- a clock that doesn’t tell you the time until you hit it with a hammer
- a steam press...
all up in da pussy like
Given Shellder’s evolution, I’d say “you are what you eat” has never been...
i feel like everyone in the supernatural fandom wants a human!impala episode, but they are torn between wanting it to be a badass...
Good hair and makeup are two very important factors for any Lolita coord and I think they can really help your particular problem. I have tutorials...